Evaluation & Organizational Development
Program & Project Evaluation
An evaluation is only worth commissioning if someone intends to act on it. We design evaluations backwards from that action — the funding decision, the scale-up call, the course correction — so the report lands as evidence, not as shelf-ware.
Scope of work
Framework first, fieldwork second, findings that bite.
We build the evaluation framework before a single interview happens: questions, indicators, methods and judgement criteria agreed with the commissioning body. Data collection then runs on the same field discipline as our baseline practice — trained enumerators, digital capture, back-checks — and analysis is presented against the money spent, not beside it.
- Evaluation framework design: questions, indicators, methods and judgement criteria fixed up front
- Impact measurement against baseline values, with attribution treated honestly — contribution claimed only where evidence supports it
- Return-on-investment and value-for-money analysis that puts outcomes beside cost per beneficiary
- Data collection and stakeholder surveys across beneficiaries, frontline staff, partners and funders
- Mid-term, endline and ex-post designs, matched to where the programme actually is
- Actionable performance reports: ranked findings, specific recommendations, named owners — and a management-response template
DesignJudgement criteria agreed before fieldwork
EvidenceSurveys, records and field verification triangulated
ActionRecommendations with owners, not observations
Need to know what the programme actually achieved?
Tell us the decision the evaluation must inform. We will design backwards from there.
Discuss this service All Evaluation & OD services